 |
|
Critical
Writings ->
Academic Journals -> Newpaper Articles & Reviews>
Books
Articles and Reviews: BOOKS
An Age of Innocence (Irish Culture 1930-1960)
By Brian Fallon
(Gill & Macmillian)
Brian Fallon, the semi-retired former chief critic
of The Irish Times, has produced a book of cultural counter-revisionism,
the central thesis of which is that the thirties, forties and fifties
in Ireland were not nearly as bad as is universally accepted today,
and that the country was not the cultural backwater or desert that
everyone now seems to suppose.
Aside from cataloguing the literary, artistic and
intellectual activity of these years, he also argues that the pendulum
has swung too far in the other direction. He sets about putting
us right by focusing on three main areas. Firstly, there was the
power and authority of the Catholic Church during these years, and
the unquestioning obedience of the majority to it. He makes the
point that, ‘Unthinking clericalism has simply given way to unthinking
anti-clericalism; the coin has been flipped to come down heads instead
of tails - but it remains the same well-worn coin.’ Secondly, referring
to the monomaniacal nationalism of the era, and contrasting it with
the cosmopolitan image of itself Ireland is obsessed with creating
today, he asks, ‘Yet is not a large part of this frenzied internationalism
at heart inverted provincialism, the product of an unsure, partly-fledged
culture lacking the courage to be wholeheartedly itself? Where once
we looked to and deferred to Britain in so many fields, we now look
to the EU to tell us what we should be thinking and doing.’ Thirdly,
there was the notorious literary censorship of the period, but he
finds its present day corollary in the all-pervasive phenomenon
of Political Correctness, opining that, ‘Political Correctness indeed
appears to be the official cant of out time - the contemporary equivalent
of Victorian hypocrisy, or of the socio-religious conformity of
a large section of the Irish public forty or fifty years ago.’ He
also maintains that things were just as bad internationally as they
were here. Indeed, this is this trump card again and again, and
he refers to the hostile treatment meted out to D H Lawrence in
England, and the Hayes rules which operated in Hollywood and the
general atmosphere under McCarthyism in America. Joyce’s Ulysses
was never actually banned in Ireland, as many people believe
(it was just not readily available), while it was proscribed in
England and America for some years.
While he admits that, ‘It goes without saying that
all these accusations have a solid core of truth; the historical
evidence is sometimes overwhelming, and it has been spelt out ad
nauseam’, and there is no doubting his bona fides, since as
he writes in the introductory chapter ‘In Perspective’, ‘How much
more intelligent, and more constructive, it is to come to terms
creatively with the past than to manipulate it like a diseased limb,
or put it under interdict!’ However it does seem to this reader
that in trying to redress an admittedly skewed balance, and provide
a much needed corrective, he himself goes too far in the opposite
direction.
First published in The World of Hibernia
|
|